AdrianRuntime security for AI agents: watches actions AND reasoning traces to catch prompt injection, tool poisoning and out-of-remit behavior — blocking before the action lands. SDKs + Claude Code plugin.
Why switchBoth are runtime security for agents. Adrian watches actions and reasoning traces to catch prompt injection and tool poisoning; Failproof AI enforces named policies on tool calls across 12 harnesses and keeps the session record. Detection vs enforcement.
Full comparison → numbatPerplexity's endpoint sensor for AI agents: hooks, OTLP logs and on-disk session artifacts normalized into one CEL-matched event model, with opt-in pre-action blocking and offline forensics.
Why switchBoth normalise coding-agent hooks and session artifacts into one record. Numbat is Perplexity's sensor — observe and ship OTLP; Failproof AI observes and also blocks, with a policy engine and a local dashboard.
Full comparison → agentsightSystem-level observability for AI agents via eBPF and TLS tracing: correlates prompts and model calls with the processes, files and network the agent actually touched — no SDK, no proxy.
Why switchBoth watch what a coding agent does on the machine. AgentSight observes from the kernel with eBPF — any binary, no hooks, no blocking; Failproof AI hooks the harness and enforces policies before a tool call runs. Observe-everything vs enforce-what-you-hook.
Full comparison → statewrightState-machine guardrails for AI agents: define workflow phases once and only that phase's tools unlock — enforced across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode and Pi. Rust.
Why switchBoth gate what an agent may call. Statewright unlocks tools by workflow phase (state machine); Failproof AI blocks by policy on the call itself (what, where, with what). Phase guardrails vs content guardrails.
Full comparison →