StackMap
Subscribe

future-agi vs LangSmith

Self-hostable platform for the whole agent-quality loop: tracing, evals, simulations, datasets, guardrails and an LLM gateway — one feedback loop from prototype to production. Apache 2.0. — versus — Trace, test and monitor LLM apps in production.

The curated verdict

Same job — trace, test and monitor LLM apps. LangSmith is the polished hosted incumbent tied to the LangChain orbit; Future AGI is the Apache-2.0 self-hostable that adds simulation and guardrails.

future-agiLangSmith
Stars1.6k0
Forks469
LanguagePythonTypeScript
LicenseApache-2.0Proprietary
Last activityyesterday1 week ago
Topicsevalsevals
Curated connections23

future-agi — the curator's take

The consolidation bet: evals + observability + guardrails + simulation in one loop instead of Langfuse-plus-four-friends, with every evaluator inspectable — no black-box scoring. When NOT: its own banner says nightly, expect rough edges — pin versions and file issues; all-in-one platforms trade each component being second-best for the loop being closed; teams already invested in a tracing stack get more from adding evals to it than migrating.

LangSmith — the curator's take

Trace, test and monitor LLM apps in production.