StackMap
Subscribe

uzu vs xybrid

Rust inference engine for on-device AI on Apple Silicon (Metal, unified memory) with Swift, Python and TS bindings, OpenAI-compatible server and a TypeSafe System One decision-model API. — versus — Cross-platform on-device AI toolkit: run LLMs, ASR and TTS natively from Flutter, Unity, Kotlin, Swift or Rust on a llama.cpp and ONNX Runtime core. Private, offline, no cloud.

The curated verdict

Both are embeddable on-device inference SDKs with Swift and Rust bindings for shipping private, offline LLMs in apps; xybrid spans more platforms on llama.cpp/ONNX, uzu goes deep on Apple unified memory.

uzuxybrid
Stars3.2k513
Forks22158
LanguageRustRust
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Last activityyesterdayyesterday
Topicslocal, decision-modelslocal, voice
Curated connections55

uzu — the curator's take

Pick it when you are shipping an iOS/macOS app and want a local LLM embedded in-process — Swift Package, structured output, tool calls, and a cloud fallback through the same API. Not for NVIDIA/Linux serving (Metal and CPU only) or bring-your-own GGUF: models need its own format, converted with lalamo.

xybrid — the curator's take

The pick when the model has to ship inside the app — a mobile feature, a desktop tool, or AI NPCs in a Unity game — rather than behind your API. One Rust runtime, real SDKs per platform, and text plus speech in and out, so a voice assistant doesn't mean three vendors. The Unity binding with a playable 3D tavern demo is the differentiator; nothing else in the local stack targets game engines seriously. Check maturity per binding before committing: Flutter, Kotlin, Unity and the CLI are available, Swift is 'coming soon', and the browser SDK is a preview LiteRT.js adapter with raw typed-tensor I/O only. At 425 stars this is early, and on-device means you own model sizing, thermals and battery.