StackMap
Subscribe

engrim alternatives

Curated alternatives to engrim — and why you'd switch.

claude-mem

Cross-harness session memory: hooks capture what the agent does, an LLM compresses it into observations, and the next session gets the relevant ones back via progressive-disclosure MCP tools.

Why switchBoth are hook-driven cross-harness session memory; claude-mem runs an LLM compression pass over what the agent did, engrim stores curated decisions/facts locally with no LLM in the loop.
Full comparison →
MemMolt

Structured long-term memory over MCP: an enforced bucket-thread-memo hierarchy in one SQLite file, hybrid FTS5 + vector search fused with RRF, local embeddings.

Why switchSame single-SQLite-file, FTS5-hybrid, MCP-served memory design; memmolt enforces a bucket-thread-memo hierarchy, engrim focuses on multi-harness hooks and a bounded memory pack.
Full comparison →
pro-workflow

One SQLite store under every Claude Code session: corrections become FTS5-searchable rules that auto-load, research grows persistent wikis, and 37 hook scripts add quality gates.

Why switchBoth put an FTS5 SQLite store under coding-agent sessions and auto-load hits; pro-workflow is Claude-Code-only and correction-centric, engrim is harness-neutral and decision-centric.
Full comparison →
opencode-mem

OpenCode plugin giving coding agents persistent cross-session memory — local SQLite + vector search, automatic memory capture, user-profile learning, and a web UI. Nothing leaves your machine.

Why switchSame local SQLite + vector recall for coding agents; opencode-mem is an OpenCode plugin, engrim targets Antigravity/Claude Code/Cursor/Codex via hooks and MCP.
Full comparison →
memsearch

Zilliz's unified memory for coding agents: one Markdown + Milvus store shared across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and OpenClaw — hybrid search, plus repeated workflows distilled into skills.

Why switchBoth aim at one memory shared across Claude Code, Codex and friends; memsearch needs Milvus for retrieval, engrim is a dependency-free SQLite file.
Full comparison →