Claude Code Thinking Skills
39 Mental Models and Critical-Thinking Frameworks for Claude Code
Claude Code Thinking Skills is a collection of 39 mental-model and critical-thinking frameworks for Claude Code that give Anthropic's AI coding agent structured ways to reason about decisions, debugging, systems, risk, and strategy. Each skill packages a proven thinking framework — from first-principles reasoning to the theory of constraints — into a Claude Code skill you can invoke by name, and the whole collection is backed by a transparent, replication-gated evaluation pipeline.

TL;DR — At a Glance
| What it is | A library of 39 mental-model and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code. |
| Who it's for | Engineers, founders, and analysts who want Claude Code to reason with structured frameworks instead of ad-hoc heuristics. |
| How to start | Install via the plugin marketplace, then invoke thinking-model-router to be routed to the right skill. |
| License | MIT — free to use, modify, and distribute. |
| Evidence | Every skill ran through a replication-gated Elevate-or-Kill evaluation pipeline. The honest headline: zero skills currently hold a robust, replicated ELEVATE verdict — and we publish that result rather than hide it. |
| Entry point | thinking-model-router → START HERE |
Table of Contents
- Why This Project Is Different
- Features
- Quick Start
- Available Skills
- How the Skills Were Evaluated
- Quality Assurance Tools
- Detailed Skill Descriptions
- FAQ
- Contributing
- Keywords
- Related Resources
- License
- Author
Why This Project Is Different
Most "AI prompt pack" repositories claim their content makes models smarter and never test the claim. This project did the opposite: it built an objective, length-controlled, replication-gated evaluation harness and ran all 39 skills through it. The result is documented openly, including the inconvenient finding that no skill yet meets the bar for a proven, replicated accuracy gain.
That rigor is the point. These skills are useful structured-reasoning scaffolds grounded in established frameworks, and the evaluation methodology is honest enough to tell you exactly how strong the evidence is. Transparency over hype is the standard here.
Features
- 39 Thinking Frameworks — A curated library of mental models for decision-making, debugging, and strategy.
- Eval-Backed and Honest — Built and tested with a rigorous, replication-gated evaluation pipeline; see the Elevate-or-Kill Scorecard.
- Battle-Tested Foundations — Grounded in frameworks from cognitive science, systems thinking, and strategic analysis (Munger, Meadows, Kahneman, Goldratt, Altshuller/TRIZ, Boyd/OODA).