herdrAgent multiplexer for your terminal: every Claude Code/Codex session in real panes — blocked/working/done at a glance, detach and reattach over SSH, plus a socket API agents drive themselves.
Why switchBoth supervise many concurrent coding-agent sessions at a glance. Herdr is a terminal multiplexer you can detach and reattach over SSH with a socket API; AO is a desktop app with Kanban and a planning orchestrator above the workers.
Full comparison → squadMulti-agent terminal collaboration for AI CLIs: a manager, workers and an inspector — Claude Code, Gemini, Codex, OpenCode — coordinating through one-shot shell commands and SQLite. No daemon.
Why switchSame job — several coding CLIs cooperating on one repo with a manager above workers. Squad is daemonless, coordinating through shell commands and SQLite; AO runs a daemon plus a native GUI and owns the workspaces.
Full comparison → alookSelf-hosted collaboration layer that turns local coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode) into an always-on "AI company" — per-agent email, org chart, kanban, shared memory.
Why switchBoth wrap local coding agents into an org-shaped surface with roles, boards and shared context. alook is a self-hosted web 'AI company' with per-agent email and an org chart; AO is a native desktop IDE centred on tasks and pull requests.
Full comparison → fabroRust 'software factory' for coding agents: define the SDLC as a graph, agents execute it through verification gates, you intervene only at the stages that matter. Server, runs board, sandboxes.
Why switchBoth drive agent work through an SDLC with gates. Fabro makes you define the graph up front and intervene only at chosen stages; AO keeps a human in a live Kanban and lets the orchestrator replan interactively.
Full comparison →